WEN04: technology, data analysis and evaluation

Technological affordances influence communication but do not determine it completely. Consider character limits, editability, audience visibility, speed and multimodality alongside users’ purposes. Avoid claims that all digital language is informal or careless. Compare suitably matched data and distinguish technology effects from genre, relationship or topic.

Consider the original model “A public post may explain context that a private group message leaves implicit.” alongside “An editable document supports revision differently from a live conversation.”. Use these as small demonstrations of the method, not as claims about an entire community or genre. An effective analytical response moves from an accurate observation to an interpretation and then to a contextual explanation. If another interpretation is plausible, test it against the available evidence. For original writing, reverse that process: decide the audience and effect before choosing the form. Read the finished work again to assess whether its language actually fulfils the intention.

වැඩි විස්තර අවශ්‍ය විට පමණක් මෙම කොටස කියවන්න.

Begin with what the unseen data actually shows. Apply relevant frameworks and concepts, then connect carefully to knowledge from your investigation. Do not force a familiar theory onto an incompatible example. Explain contextual meaning and acknowledge alternative readings. Research knowledge should sharpen observation, not replace attention to the new material.

Consider the original model “A directive in the unseen text can be compared with a pattern in the research data.” alongside “A different audience may explain a contrasting politeness strategy.”. Use these as small demonstrations of the method, not as claims about an entire community or genre. An effective analytical response moves from an accurate observation to an interpretation and then to a contextual explanation. If another interpretation is plausible, test it against the available evidence. For original writing, reverse that process: decide the audience and effect before choosing the form. Read the finished work again to assess whether its language actually fulfils the intention.

වැඩි විස්තර අවශ්‍ය විට පමණක් මෙම කොටස කියවන්න.

An extended response needs a focused argument, precise linguistic evidence and critical use of relevant research. Connect the unseen issue, concepts and investigated data where required. Evaluate scope and limitations rather than treating a small study as universal proof. The final judgement should answer the question and reflect the strength of the evidence.

Consider the original model “The data supports a contextual association, but it cannot establish a universal causal rule.” alongside “Two examples illuminate a pattern while leaving wider variation unresolved.”. Use these as small demonstrations of the method, not as claims about an entire community or genre. An effective analytical response moves from an accurate observation to an interpretation and then to a contextual explanation. If another interpretation is plausible, test it against the available evidence. For original writing, reverse that process: decide the audience and effect before choosing the form. Read the finished work again to assess whether its language actually fulfils the intention.

වැඩි විස්තර අවශ්‍ය විට පමණක් මෙම කොටස කියවන්න.